With the dynamic business landscape, many companies are embracing flexibility and adaptability as they navigate the ever-changing market. As someone who has worked in the technology and recruitment sector for a while, I’ve come across a common misconception that I’d like to address: the perception that contractors are significantly more expensive than permanent employees. I'd like to give light to the true cost of hiring a contractor and explore why it might be more budget-friendly than you think.
Let’s start by acknowledging the elephant in the room – the hourly rate. It’s no secret that contractors often come with an hourly rate that seems higher than what you’d pay a permanent employee. But here’s the thing: an employee salary is just the tip of the iceberg. When you hire an employee, there’s a whole set of additional costs and overheads that can significantly impact on your bottom line.
Let’s break them down:
When you employ a permanent employee, you’re obliged to contribute to ACC levies. These can add up and represent a substantial ongoing cost to your business. Contractors, on the other hand, handle their own ACC payments, freeing you from this financial burden. As I write this it sits at approx. $0.63 per $100 of payroll. Example being, a $100K Salary = $630 per annum.
Permanent employees are entitled to Kiwisaver contributions from their employers. While it’s a great benefit for them, it’s an added cost for your business. Contractors manage their own retirement savings, releasing you from this expense. At the minimum contribution of 3% that is $3,000 based on a salary of $100,000 per annum.
Investing in the professional growth of your employees is essential. However, it can be costly and time-consuming. Contractors typically bring their existing skills and experience to the table, minimising the need for extensive initial training and ongoing development programs. Various benchmarks have this between 1% - 5% of an individual’s salary. Based on a $100,000 per annum this could be between $1,000 - $5,000 per annum.
Providing certain benefits to your employees can trigger fringe benefit tax liabilities. Contractors are not subject to this tax, which means you can offer perks without worrying about additional financial implications.
Permanent employees often receive benefits such as health insurance, paid annual leave, and more. While these are important for staff retention, they can substantially increase your personnel expenses. On the other hand, contractors manage their own benefits and extras, giving you more predictability in your budget.
A business is responsible for looking after professional indemnity and public liability insurance which cover their permanent employees. On the flip side, contractors typically have their own insurance coverage, reducing your insurance-related costs.
So, what’s the bottom line? Hiring contractors can be a cost-effective choice when you consider the bigger picture. While the hourly rate may seem higher, it’s essential to factor in the myriad of savings associated with not having to manage all the costs and overheads that come with permanent employees.
Don’t get me wrong – permanent employees are valuable assets to any organisation. They bring stability, commitment, IP retention, and a sense of belonging to your team. But the key is understanding the differences between contractors and permanent employees and leveraging them to your advantage.
Think of hiring contractors as a strategic move that provides the flexibility to scale your workforce up or down as needed, without long-term financial commitments. It’s not about one being better than the other; it’s about making informed choices that align with your business objectives.
So, the next time you consider bringing in a contractor, remember the true cost isn’t just about the hourly rate- it’s about the holistic value they bring to your organisation.
All content copyrighted Recruit I.T. © All rights reserved | Terms & Conditions